Абмеркаваньне:Глябальнае пацяпленьне
Updating the article
[рэдагаваць крыніцу]Hello W and other Belarussians,
Sorry for writing in English on your Wikipedia. As you know I deleted a lot of stuff as part of https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Climate_change_portal/climate_denial_review
But of course you can edit the article much better than me. There is a lot of new info in the English article, for example nowadays you can easily translate most of the graphics. I know Belarus has ratified the Paris Agreement so it would be interesting to read about your "nationally determined contribution". I see there is a renewable energy article in Ukranian uk:Відновлювана енергетика Білорусі and that you have a lot of resources and more might be exported Chidgk1 (гутаркі) 12:24, 23 сьнежня 2021 (+03)
- Hello! How are you? Please, stop deleting the sources with citations from academics as critisism is not a denial & such deletion is against the en:Wikipedia:Neutral point of view, and no project on Meta Wiki or elsewhere has authority to override this pillar rule (en:Wikipedia:Five pillars): "This policy is non-negotiable, and the principles upon which it is based cannot be superseded by other policies or guidelines, nor by editor consensus". Best wishes,--Удзельнік:W 13:32, 23 сьнежня 2021 (UTC+3)
- W As a fossil fuel importer Belarus can tackle climate change and save money at the same time. Let's give our readers something true, up to date and cheerful. (your English is very good but feel free to reply in your language if you wish as Google Translate is quite good) Chidgk1 (гутаркі) 14:47, 23 сьнежня 2021 (+03)
- I have updated en:Renewable energy in Belarus Chidgk1 (гутаркі) 18:03, 23 сьнежня 2021 (+03)
- About NPOV: the article now gives a false balance. It gives as much space to criticism supported by non-experts, as to the actual science. That is at odds with the neutrality policy. Femkemilene (гутаркі) 09:58, 24 сьнежня 2021 (+03)
- Why does the article need to have the same paragraph twice? Even if we disagree on whether it's pseudoscience or criticism, it is clear that the paragraph should not be in the article twice. Femkemilene (гутаркі) 16:17, 8 студзеня 2022 (+03)
- About NPOV: the article now gives a false balance. It gives as much space to criticism supported by non-experts, as to the actual science. That is at odds with the neutrality policy. Femkemilene (гутаркі) 09:58, 24 сьнежня 2021 (+03)
- W (or any other editor reading this who would like to co-operate) I wish you would look at the big picture outside Wikipedia. Can't you see that your country gets so much bad publicity in the world. Here is your chance to add a little something positive about Belarussia with our help, but you seem to be squandering the opportunity. Soon we will give up trying to improve this article and you will lose our potential co-operation to improve articles about your country on English Wikipedia. To take just one example together we could look at how much carbon your wonderful en:Białowieża Forest sequesters. How about it? Chidgk1 (гутаркі) 21:34, 3 студзеня 2022 (+03)